Comments on: Rheta Shan

By: Extraordinary claims

Extraordinary claims — Wed, 13 May 2009 07:30:14 +0000

Several things cast doubt on the truth of this story.

For example:

The “tech guy” writes in a comment that the RL husband must not ever know about her SL. However, the RL husband knows the tech guy who runs her SL blog, enough so as to notify him. And the tech guy then publishes the letter verbatim.

The more you look at it, the more inconsistencies you find. Read the blogs, the archive.org copy of the original blog, and the plurk timelines.

I’ll mourn when I see an obituary, or a news story. Until then, extraordinary claims require proof.

By: Tateru

Tateru — Wed, 13 May 2009 06:50:59 +0000

It seems I use ‘Apparently’ a lot when it comes to Obituaries: http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/category/people/obituaries/

By: What is this crap?

What is this crap? — Tue, 12 May 2009 15:25:49 +0000

For thou art not so……

Dubito ergo sum. It’s three simple words that drives every critical-thinking cynic.

As well as many a conspiracy nut, I suppose. But those are few and far between, and often engrossed in meaningful endeavors like the Moon Landing, Kennedy’s Assass…

By: Tateru

Tateru — Mon, 11 May 2009 20:47:43 +0000

A part of me keeps hoping it will turn out to be wrong, or not true. As it does every time.

By: Gwyneth Llewelyn

Gwyneth Llewelyn — Mon, 11 May 2009 20:45:06 +0000

Oh my… when I read the words “apparently died” I was expecting that, well, at some point, you would announce that this was not the case!

Unfortunately it seems that I just read that wrongly

Farewell, Rheta.