<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Australia be barred from Second Life access?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/</link>
	<description>VIRTUAL WORLDS, SECOND LIFE, STATISTICS, CULTURE, LAW, GAMING, ECLECTIC ODDITIES.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zindra</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-2/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>zindra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>Their management of tickets (it&#039;s very strange), the first phase should be directed to the merchant and can be noticed that a lot of benefit of the individual lots are not traders, some traders doing more in the adult not been categorized as such, and were proposing to buy their land.

So we can ask many questions especially since the avatars have obtained lots are recent or dealer of land.

Many old avatar, we decided to close their paid account to go on Opensim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their management of tickets (it&#8217;s very strange), the first phase should be directed to the merchant and can be noticed that a lot of benefit of the individual lots are not traders, some traders doing more in the adult not been categorized as such, and were proposing to buy their land.</p>
<p>So we can ask many questions especially since the avatars have obtained lots are recent or dealer of land.</p>
<p>Many old avatar, we decided to close their paid account to go on Opensim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juko</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-2/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Juko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>And things are stirring in Australia too :-)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/09/2621354.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Save the Children opposes Internet filter&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And things are stirring in Australia too <img src='http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/09/2621354.htm" rel="nofollow">Save the Children opposes Internet filter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-2/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Okay, so the Lab has no confirmation. I don&#039;t either. I&#039;m still trying to get the media people at the Minister&#039;s office to talk about the proposal at all. They don&#039;t seem to be willing to talk to the media about the proposal at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so the Lab has no confirmation. I don&#8217;t either. I&#8217;m still trying to get the media people at the Minister&#8217;s office to talk about the proposal at all. They don&#8217;t seem to be willing to talk to the media about the proposal at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberik Rotaru</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-2/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberik Rotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m relying on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://techticker.net/2009/07/01/no-indications-from-the-australian-government-that-it-plans-to-block-second-life/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;statement&lt;/a&gt; from Linden Lab. I assume, perhaps bravely, that LL actually contacted Conroy&#039;s office before issuing that statement.

As noted at Dusan&#039;s site SL has never been mentioned in the Senate or House of Representatives and there is only one committee mention. 

The Act itself defines &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cfacga1995489/s5.html#interactive_game&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interactive game&lt;/a&gt; as having stages or levels. My own judgement is that a court could not read the definition, taking account of the purposive rule in Australian law, to include SL which lacks those characteristics. 

I do not exclude the possibility that Conroy, a social conservative nutter with no grasp of technical issues, may want to legislate against virtual worlds at some stage. I do say he has no chance of passing such a law. The numbers in the present Senate would prevent the passage of such legislation and, at least in the case of SL, the limited protection for freedom of communication first articulated by the High Court in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1992/46.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills&lt;/a&gt; would, at least arguably, make such a ban unconstitutional.

I am told, although I cannot quote any source for obvious reasons, that there is considerable disquiet in the ALP caucus over Conroy&#039;s enthusiasm for banning stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m relying on the <a href="http://techticker.net/2009/07/01/no-indications-from-the-australian-government-that-it-plans-to-block-second-life/" rel="nofollow">statement</a> from Linden Lab. I assume, perhaps bravely, that LL actually contacted Conroy&#8217;s office before issuing that statement.</p>
<p>As noted at Dusan&#8217;s site SL has never been mentioned in the Senate or House of Representatives and there is only one committee mention. </p>
<p>The Act itself defines <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cfacga1995489/s5.html#interactive_game" rel="nofollow">interactive game</a> as having stages or levels. My own judgement is that a court could not read the definition, taking account of the purposive rule in Australian law, to include SL which lacks those characteristics. </p>
<p>I do not exclude the possibility that Conroy, a social conservative nutter with no grasp of technical issues, may want to legislate against virtual worlds at some stage. I do say he has no chance of passing such a law. The numbers in the present Senate would prevent the passage of such legislation and, at least in the case of SL, the limited protection for freedom of communication first articulated by the High Court in <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1992/46.html" rel="nofollow">Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills</a> would, at least arguably, make such a ban unconstitutional.</p>
<p>I am told, although I cannot quote any source for obvious reasons, that there is considerable disquiet in the ALP caucus over Conroy&#8217;s enthusiasm for banning stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>Really? My understanding is that Linden Lab has not sought confirmation from Conroy&#039;s office at all. Where did they say it? I&#039;d like to see exactly what they confirmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? My understanding is that Linden Lab has not sought confirmation from Conroy&#8217;s office at all. Where did they say it? I&#8217;d like to see exactly what they confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberik Rotaru</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberik Rotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>My understanding from the statement by Linden Lab is that Second Life is not a game within the terms of current law or any proposed law. LL say they have confirmed that with Conroy&#039;s office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding from the statement by Linden Lab is that Second Life is not a game within the terms of current law or any proposed law. LL say they have confirmed that with Conroy&#8217;s office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>A good find, definitely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good find, definitely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faerie</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Faerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>*

      n Australia the transcripts of what is said in Parliament are known as “Hansard”. Senator Conroy’s specific answer to the question about blocking (not banning - blocking access) can be read here:

      http://www.aph.gov.au/Hansard/senate/dailys/ds220609.pdf

      Page 95 (PDF page 109), Scott Ludlam, Question 1496.13: “Will computer games exceeding the requirements of the MA15+ classification be RC and potentially blocked by ISPs on a mandatory basis for adults; if not, what other exceptions to RC would be similarly permitted.”

      Page 96 (PDF page 110), Stephen Conroy’s Answer: “Computer games that exceed an MA15+ rating are deemed to be RC content as there is no R18+ or X18+ rating. RC content will be included in the mandatory filtering of RC content under the Government’s proposal. Issues relating to the classification of computer games fall within the Attorney-General’s portfolio.

speak up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>      n Australia the transcripts of what is said in Parliament are known as “Hansard”. Senator Conroy’s specific answer to the question about blocking (not banning &#8211; blocking access) can be read here:</p>
<p>      <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Hansard/senate/dailys/ds220609.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.aph.gov.au/Hansard/senate/dailys/ds220609.pdf</a></p>
<p>      Page 95 (PDF page 109), Scott Ludlam, Question 1496.13: “Will computer games exceeding the requirements of the MA15+ classification be RC and potentially blocked by ISPs on a mandatory basis for adults; if not, what other exceptions to RC would be similarly permitted.”</p>
<p>      Page 96 (PDF page 110), Stephen Conroy’s Answer: “Computer games that exceed an MA15+ rating are deemed to be RC content as there is no R18+ or X18+ rating. RC content will be included in the mandatory filtering of RC content under the Government’s proposal. Issues relating to the classification of computer games fall within the Attorney-General’s portfolio.</p>
<p>speak up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>Over the last 48 hours, I&#039;ve had about as many people tell me that Senator Conroy has explicitly stated that SL &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; be barred as have told me that he has explicitly stated that it &lt;em&gt;will not&lt;/em&gt; be barred.

That&#039;s a lot of people.

Moreover, it is a lot of people who haven&#039;t been able to point to any such statement.

I&#039;ve still been unable to get a response from either Linden Lab (whom I have asked for a comment) or from Senator Conroy&#039;s media people (whom I have asked to whom we go to to &lt;em&gt;get&lt;/em&gt; a comment. Repeatedly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last 48 hours, I&#8217;ve had about as many people tell me that Senator Conroy has explicitly stated that SL <em>will</em> be barred as have told me that he has explicitly stated that it <em>will not</em> be barred.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of people.</p>
<p>Moreover, it is a lot of people who haven&#8217;t been able to point to any such statement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve still been unable to get a response from either Linden Lab (whom I have asked for a comment) or from Senator Conroy&#8217;s media people (whom I have asked to whom we go to to <em>get</em> a comment. Repeatedly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valiant Westland</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Valiant Westland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>Australia’s ban of Second Life and other similar sites sets a dangerous precedent that should strike fear into the hearts of free people everywhere.  A “free” country that has a “Minister for Censorship!?”  This is something we might expect from China, North Korea or Iran, but Australia!?  The Nazis would be so proud!

Those who call themselves “Christians” or “Moral,” might see this as a “victory” over “evil.”  But for them, as well as all who applaud this travesty of freedom I will quote Benjamin Franklin, who said:

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

It appears the people of Australia are still prisoners, exiled as were their forefathers and permitted only the freedoms their masters deem fit.  It will be interesting to see if they accept this Orwellian destiny or rise up and demand the freedoms so many of them have given their blood to defend around the world.

As for Second Life (SL) and its “danger” as a source of adult content; SL is no more or less dangerous than the rest of the Internet.  Those who wish to can find virtually anything they want on the Internet, good, bad or indifferent.

It should be up to adults and parents, not a “Nanny State,” to take the steps necessary to limit exposure to content they deem inappropriate for themselves or their children.  This can be done at the individual PC or user level.

By banning access to Second Life, the Australian government is not only cutting off access to “adult” content, but also art, music, education and collaboration opportunities that have the potential to enlighten, inspire and improve the lives of its citizens, young and old alike.  If the government of Australia succeeds in censoring SL from their citizens, those of us who work, learn and yes “play” in Second Life will miss the tremendous spirit and contributions our Australian brothers and sisters make to SL everyday.

I close with a quote from another of our (American) Founding Fathers, that I hope will be taken to heart by all those who love freedom in Australia and around the world:

“”The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”  Thomas Jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia’s ban of Second Life and other similar sites sets a dangerous precedent that should strike fear into the hearts of free people everywhere.  A “free” country that has a “Minister for Censorship!?”  This is something we might expect from China, North Korea or Iran, but Australia!?  The Nazis would be so proud!</p>
<p>Those who call themselves “Christians” or “Moral,” might see this as a “victory” over “evil.”  But for them, as well as all who applaud this travesty of freedom I will quote Benjamin Franklin, who said:</p>
<p>“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”</p>
<p>It appears the people of Australia are still prisoners, exiled as were their forefathers and permitted only the freedoms their masters deem fit.  It will be interesting to see if they accept this Orwellian destiny or rise up and demand the freedoms so many of them have given their blood to defend around the world.</p>
<p>As for Second Life (SL) and its “danger” as a source of adult content; SL is no more or less dangerous than the rest of the Internet.  Those who wish to can find virtually anything they want on the Internet, good, bad or indifferent.</p>
<p>It should be up to adults and parents, not a “Nanny State,” to take the steps necessary to limit exposure to content they deem inappropriate for themselves or their children.  This can be done at the individual PC or user level.</p>
<p>By banning access to Second Life, the Australian government is not only cutting off access to “adult” content, but also art, music, education and collaboration opportunities that have the potential to enlighten, inspire and improve the lives of its citizens, young and old alike.  If the government of Australia succeeds in censoring SL from their citizens, those of us who work, learn and yes “play” in Second Life will miss the tremendous spirit and contributions our Australian brothers and sisters make to SL everyday.</p>
<p>I close with a quote from another of our (American) Founding Fathers, that I hope will be taken to heart by all those who love freedom in Australia and around the world:</p>
<p>“”The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”  Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Update time. Remember I said there was something even more wrong with the proposal? &lt;a href=&quot;http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/28/a-severe-issue-with-australias-proposed-mandatory-filtering-system/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Well, check it out&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update time. Remember I said there was something even more wrong with the proposal? <a href="http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/28/a-severe-issue-with-australias-proposed-mandatory-filtering-system/" rel="nofollow">Well, check it out</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Alas, faster broadband isn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;necessarily&lt;/em&gt; a good thing. Broadband is a really a far more complex and interrelated issue than just &quot;fat pipes are more betterer&quot;.

Unless they&#039;re also planning to drastically lower costs, and improve contention ratios as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, faster broadband isn&#8217;t <em>necessarily</em> a good thing. Broadband is a really a far more complex and interrelated issue than just &#8220;fat pipes are more betterer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Unless they&#8217;re also planning to drastically lower costs, and improve contention ratios as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>Someone in the Minister&#039;s staff seems to be clever, anyway. Targeting online games is likely to make the proposed filtering system &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; palatable to the senate, rather than less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone in the Minister&#8217;s staff seems to be clever, anyway. Targeting online games is likely to make the proposed filtering system <em>more</em> palatable to the senate, rather than less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberik Rotaru</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberik Rotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>I suspect the real problem is that Rudd does not seem to know much about technology beyond faster broadband is a good thing. When he became prime minister the prime minister&#039;s website was a real soon now page for months. There is some kind of contest between Conroy and Lindsay Tanner. Tanner was one of the sponsoring ministers for Conroy&#039;s 4-day blog in December and has just launched a Gov2.0 blog. You&#039;d expect the communications minister to run such a blog but Tanner has taken control of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the real problem is that Rudd does not seem to know much about technology beyond faster broadband is a good thing. When he became prime minister the prime minister&#8217;s website was a real soon now page for months. There is some kind of contest between Conroy and Lindsay Tanner. Tanner was one of the sponsoring ministers for Conroy&#8217;s 4-day blog in December and has just launched a Gov2.0 blog. You&#8217;d expect the communications minister to run such a blog but Tanner has taken control of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Is it a requirement, do you think, that the communications minister for whatever country seems to know fairly little about communications -- or does it just coincidentally work out that way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a requirement, do you think, that the communications minister for whatever country seems to know fairly little about communications &#8212; or does it just coincidentally work out that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juko Tempel</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Juko Tempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>A nice call to action for Australians, by Moggs Oceanlane, on Flickr and available for download under Creative Commons License: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2579/3661738337_0624b72fa8_o_d.jpg

Includes links to informative sites on the broader issue too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice call to action for Australians, by Moggs Oceanlane, on Flickr and available for download under Creative Commons License: <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2579/3661738337_0624b72fa8_o_d.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2579/3661738337_0624b72fa8_o_d.jpg</a></p>
<p>Includes links to informative sites on the broader issue too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberik Rotaru</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberik Rotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Conroy&#039;s staff are famous for never commenting on anything. They&#039;ve embarrassed themselves horribly in the past by demonstrating they know very little about the technical side of the issues they are dealing with. Scan a few media reports. They almost always carry the tag  &#039;Senator Conroy declined to comment for this article&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conroy&#8217;s staff are famous for never commenting on anything. They&#8217;ve embarrassed themselves horribly in the past by demonstrating they know very little about the technical side of the issues they are dealing with. Scan a few media reports. They almost always carry the tag  &#8216;Senator Conroy declined to comment for this article&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Still waiting on responses (of any sort) from either Senator Conroy&#039;s staff or Linden Lab -- both on behalf of work, of course.

I&#039;ve asked the Lab for a comment, and asked the Senator&#039;s staff to whom I should be directing press queries. So far, you can hear a pin drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting on responses (of any sort) from either Senator Conroy&#8217;s staff or Linden Lab &#8212; both on behalf of work, of course.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve asked the Lab for a comment, and asked the Senator&#8217;s staff to whom I should be directing press queries. So far, you can hear a pin drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adric Antfarm</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Adric Antfarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Given the ease their handguns were taken, this can&#039;t be that hard a thing to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the ease their handguns were taken, this can&#8217;t be that hard a thing to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberik Rotaru</title>
		<link>http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/2009/06/25/could-australia-be-barred-from-second-life-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberik Rotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/?p=1157#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>Conroy is a dolt with limited support in cabinet or the parliament. I seriously doubt anyone else in the government was aware of this press release or that it will get a lot of support. We do need to campaign on the issue but we do not need to get hysterical. And Tateru is dead right about the new Adult continent. It is hard how to imagine how LL could have painted a bigger target on themselves then this silly policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conroy is a dolt with limited support in cabinet or the parliament. I seriously doubt anyone else in the government was aware of this press release or that it will get a lot of support. We do need to campaign on the issue but we do not need to get hysterical. And Tateru is dead right about the new Adult continent. It is hard how to imagine how LL could have painted a bigger target on themselves then this silly policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
