• About us…

  • The archives

  • RSS The Gaming Session



  •  Better and faster with IPv6

  • ipv6 ready

It’s not escaped notice that a part of the job advertisement for a new Linden Lab company spokesperson lists “Plan and execute a broad PR strategy for communicating Linden Lab’s industry leadership and rebranding efforts” as a key responsibility.

The two words “Second Life” are, I believe, a lousy brand name, overloaded as they are with all manner of inappropriate meanings. In fact, the name – when originally selected – was not at all popular among many employees of Linden Lab itself, for just that reason.

However, “rebranding” covers a lot of territory, and doesn’t always include changing the name or logo of the brand itself.

Sometimes rebranding is better referred to as “repositioning”, casting an old brand in a new light. Changing its image, if you will. Certainly Second Life’s image is less than stellar, even if the service is used and enjoyed by many.

A rebranding example would be a popular brand of analgesic in Australia. A major product contamination incident forced the recall of products from retail outlets some years ago, and the brand lost considerable market-share to competitors as a result of the loss of trust in the product. The company worked hard to rebrand the product. Not by changing its name, or its logos or trade-dress, but by hammering home the message of how “trustworthy” the brand is.

Since that campaign started, I don’t believe there’s a shred of marketing for the brand that doesn’t reiterate how well-trusted it is. “Australia’s most trusted,” they say or, “Trusted by more Australians.”

Mind you, if you were armed with a well-equipped laboratory and a mass-spectrometer, you likely couldn’t discern the slightest difference between this product and any of its cheaper, more generic competitors.

Media literacy lesson: Watch out when a brand tells you how you should feel about it. If the brand says it is cool, or it is trusted, or it is hip – well, it probably isn’t. Either you already think it is what it is, or you don’t. It’s rare for a brand to tell you what its image is if the image is actually true. In approachable terms: Smiling Jim doesn’t smile very much, except when he’s taking your money; Crazy Eddie isn’t crazy, and apparently neither are his prices; and as for Honest Bob – well, I’ll leave that to you.

Bonus marketing lesson: “If you’ve got nothing to say, sing it.” – If you can’t even manage the above without choking, sing your company name, a slogan or a phone number. At least people will stand a chance of remembering it.

So – back on the topic, at last – Linden Lab’s rebranding efforts for Second Life are hard to pin down. I wouldn’t absolutely rule out a name change as “Second Life” is a rubbish name for a “shared creativity tool” – if that’s where the Lab wants to pitch the image.

Certainly there’s only so far the image can be repositioned, however, without actually going the whole-hog and changing the name – but that would be a huge effort.

I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see.

Tags: , , , , ,



Got a news tip or a press-release? Send it to [email protected].

  • Support us

    Writing is my day job. Site advertising pays for the hosting, but nothing else. Help keep us in coffee and keyboards

    ... or donate in Second Life at this location.

  • ...or use Flattr

  • Read previous post:
    Close